Jerome Kym vs Denis Yevseyev Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• When it comes to winning points on second serves in the last six months, Kym has been slightly more effective, securing 46.34% compared to Yevseyev's 41.52%. Could this give Kym an edge in the upcoming match? It appears so, given the correlation with match success.
• Analyzing return game strength, Yevseyev shows slightly better performance by winning 50.94% of second serve return points, while Kym wins 47.43%. Yevseyev also outperforms Kym on first serve returns, leading 29.64% to 21.76%.
• Facing breakpoints, Kym demonstrates resilience, saving 56.2% compared to Yevseyev's 46.07%. This could be pivotal in tight moments of the match.
• Kym holds a better overall win rate over the past year, with 59.65% of matches won versus Yevseyev’s 38.81%. This indicates stronger overall performance.
• On hard courts, both players find their best footing, but Kym edges out with a 74% win rate in this setting, compared to 55% from Yevseyev.
• Participation level analysis reveals Kym excels in lower tier tournaments, winning 65.79% of such matches, whereas Yevseyev manages a 38.18% win rate. Does this suggest Kym is more adept at closing out matches in this environment? Evidence suggests it might.
• Considering the ranks of opponents faced, Kym has consistently competed against higher-caliber players (average rank 247.82) compared to Yevseyev (297.36), suggesting a potentially tougher path to maintaining their win rates.
• If a match progresses to a deciding set, Kym has won 38% of such scenarios, slightly outperforming Yevseyev's 30% win record in tight matches.
• In terms of converting break points, both players show similar capability, with Yevseyev slightly in front at 35.45% versus Kym's 34.88%.

Editorial Prediction (August 4, 2025, UTC):

Assessing the various factors, it's clear that both players have strengths and weaknesses, but the statistics highlight several key advantages for Kym.

Kym's slightly superior performance in second serve points and breakpoint saving suggests a potential upper hand in maintaining service games under pressure.

Despite Yevseyev's stronger statistical showing on return games, Kym's stronger historical performance, particularly on hard surfaces, and ability to challenge higher-ranked opponents provide a persuasive case for their potential success.

In a tight contest, particularly if it extends to a deciding set, Kym appears better positioned to clinch victory, thanks to their overall match-winning history and marginally better handling of pressure situations.

Consequently, based on the current analysis, Kym is the more likely victor in the upcoming match against Yevseyev.